So, maybe this is a dumb question.....
But once the SEFI HO 5.0 came out in 1986, why did Ford continue using the 5.8 VV in the police cruisers (also available to public in Canada I think)?
I mean, even when saddled with the E6 heads, the 5.0 HO produced more horsepower and torque than the 5.8, albeit at a higher RPM.
It seems to me, at least in theory, that giving the police cruisers the 5.0 HO motor, and steeper rear gears, might've been extremely beneficial, one, from a reliability point of view, and two, from a fuel-usage point of view, given that I've seen people refer to the horrible fuel economy those 5.8s had. I imagine emissions would be easier to control with the SEFI cars as well.
So, why'd they not do what I suggest? I mean, ok, it's not like they can turn on a FutureVision device right now and from the year 1985 or so ask me in 2009 what they should do? Surely it must've occurred to *someone*, so why'd they stick with the 5.8?
Just curious is all....
But once the SEFI HO 5.0 came out in 1986, why did Ford continue using the 5.8 VV in the police cruisers (also available to public in Canada I think)?
I mean, even when saddled with the E6 heads, the 5.0 HO produced more horsepower and torque than the 5.8, albeit at a higher RPM.
It seems to me, at least in theory, that giving the police cruisers the 5.0 HO motor, and steeper rear gears, might've been extremely beneficial, one, from a reliability point of view, and two, from a fuel-usage point of view, given that I've seen people refer to the horrible fuel economy those 5.8s had. I imagine emissions would be easier to control with the SEFI cars as well.
So, why'd they not do what I suggest? I mean, ok, it's not like they can turn on a FutureVision device right now and from the year 1985 or so ask me in 2009 what they should do? Surely it must've occurred to *someone*, so why'd they stick with the 5.8?
Just curious is all....
Comment