i am looking at buying a 390 out of a 79 ford pickup and was wondering how big of a job it would be to put it in my 84 cv? what would i need to do the swap i have the knowladge to do it i have before but what would it take other than that?
![]() |
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
390 swap?
Collapse
X
-
You need a FE pattern C6 and a neutral balance flexplate. You will need a custom length driveshaft. There may be a truck oil pan which will work for you or you need an aftermarket oil pan. There should be a shorty header which you can use or a set of Mustang 428CJ factory manifolds should work.
-
there was a 390 in 79?
1986 lincoln towncar signature series. 5.0 HO with thumper performance ported e7 heads, 1.7 roller rockers, warm air intake, 65mm throttle body, 1/2" intake spacer, ported intakes, 3.73 rear with trac lock, 98-02 front brake conversion, 92-97 rear disc conversion, 1" rear swaybar, 1 3/16" front swaybar, 16" wheels and tires, loud ass stereo system, badass cb, best time to date 15.94 at 87 mph. lots of mods in the works 221.8 rwhp 278 rwt
2006 Lincoln Town Car Signature. Stock for now
1989 Ford F-250 4x4 much much more to come, sefi converted so far.
1986 Toyota pickup with LSC wheels and 225/60/16 tires.
2008 Hyundai Elantra future Revcon toad
1987 TriBurner and 1986 Alaska stokers keeping me warm. (and some pesky oil heat)
please be patient, rebuilding an empire!
Comment
-
Not a small project at all. 79 should be a 400 or a 351m if it wasnt a 351w. 390 ended production in 74 or 75 I believe. Possible someone stabbed one in there though, old trucks often have all sorts of weird non-original BS86 Lincoln Town Car (Galactica).
5.0 HO, CompCams XE258,Scorpion 1.72 roller rockers, 3.55 K code rear, tow package, BHPerformance ported E7 heads, Tmoss Explorer intake, 65mm throttle body, Hedman 1 5/8" headers, 2.5" dual exhaust, ASP underdrive pulley
91 Lincoln Mark VII LSC grandpa spec white and cranberry
1984 Lincoln Continental TurboDiesel - rolls coal
Originally posted by phayzer5
I drive a Lincoln. I can't be bothered to shift like the peasants and rabble rousers
Everything looks like voodoo if you don't understand how it works
Comment
-
427 cammer would be the coolest...'88 Colony Park, white with wood grain contact paper, K code axle, hose pliers on heater hoses, factory duals, big plans in the future...
'83 Toyota 4x4, 31x10.50 15, could use a new carb, custom humidifying holes in the roof, mud based paint...
Comment
-
390 and 360 were axed in trucks in 75, 351m 400 were then installed for 76.
2009 Ford F-350 6.4 powerstroke diesel. 1977 Ford F-150 built 300 six, 5 speed trans. 1976 MG MGB roadster, 359w, t5 5 speed. 1996 Kawasaki ninja ZX6R.
My rod is glowing, my bead is clean, my middle name is acetylene
Comment
-
Could be a 460 as well. Several people have swapped 385-Series Big blocks, I don't think I've heard of any of them being too great on the street, though.
Whatever motor is in that truck probably needs freshened up anyway. Why not drop in an Exploder 5.0? It's a much more friendly swap and you'll have more horsepower, stock for stock.1990 Country Squire - under restoration
1988 Crown Vic LTD Wagon - daily beater
GMN Box Panther History
Box Panther Horsepower and Torque Ratings
Box Panther Production Numbers
Comment
-
Exploder 302 is useless in comparison to a 351M or larger engine in a truck.. FE and Cleveland (335 series) motors eat GT40 motors for breakfast and have room for a SB Chevy in their tummies...... GT40 motors weep at just the sight of a 429 or 460.....
1979 was nearly 30 years ago. FE motors were VERY popular swaps over those years.. A 390 4V engine makes 427 ft lbs of torque stock... Try that with a 302 once.....
This thread is useless without pics if the engine family and size is in question......
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mercracer View PostA 390 4V engine makes 427 ft lbs of torque stock...1990 Country Squire - under restoration
1988 Crown Vic LTD Wagon - daily beater
GMN Box Panther History
Box Panther Horsepower and Torque Ratings
Box Panther Production Numbers
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tiggie View PostI know you know that's gross and on early passenger car 390. Convert it to net and run it through an automatic and you're left with about 275 ft lbs if you're lucky. A stock 5.0 HO can come pretty close to that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mrltd View PostThere is no way our 400 can compare to a explorer motor. I blew a 9" nodular into a bunch of little pieces...A 302 aint gonna do that.
.
.
.
.
.
If it looks like this, it is NOT a nodular...
What exactly did you "blow to pieces" ? Bearing failure or trac lok spider failure does not equate to blowing a diff to pieces due to too much torque... The weak point in a truck 9" carrier is the inner pinion bearing support. Guys mess their gears up or let a pinion bearing wear out and it takes out the pinion support.Last edited by Mercracer; 04-24-2008, 04:45 PM.
Comment
-
Ok, not a nodular.. Thought that was the term for the center section. I blew the pinion out the side of the carrier.....More than just the pinion support. Axle wasn't that old.
But I did it in 4wd low, without the front hubs locked, and doing a brakestand... LOLBuilder/Owner of Badass Panther Wagons
Busy maintaining a fleet of Fords
Comment
-
The inner/rear pinion support is notoriously weak on truck housings. Most likely if the pinion exited the side of the carrier, the pinion bearings failed in front which allowed play to take out the rear pinion support and then crack the carrier housing...
Comment
Comment