She's back!
Partial fail. AC fan runs constantly and - the bloody check engine light is still on
I'll be calling shortly. But the engine does run smoother and they did end up replacing the lower steering shaft. Tranny flush and new filter. And the AC does work.
So it might be going back for the engine light (it's not on the receipt). If not I start moving forward with the interior/stereo, then come the week of the 12th I'm off and will be making the big push on the suspension.
It's hard not to make a head to head comparison between the 03 and the 08 Lacrosse I've been driving. So I will
The Lacrosse does feel more 'modern' somehow. It's quieter overall, and quicker off the line, and freeway downshifts, where you use it most. Not a bad car. Acceleration = win to the Buick (even if the MGM will probably pass it down the road).
The MGM feels much more planted and much more comfortable, to me. It also feels like a more quality car than the Buick. My dad paid $22k for his, my sticker says $30k, I figure it probably actually sold for around $25k or so? Around $3-5k difference and 5 years of inflation, maybe the MGM SHOULD feel better put together. So call it a wash.
Space/truck - Win to MGM, obviously, though the Buick has a 'decent' trunk.
Gas mileage, no significant difference overall! I get around 20 average, his readout says around 21. Over 10k miles at $3.50 per gallon that amounts to a savings of less than a hundred bucks. Win to the much, much larger MGM.
Ride, the Buick has an odd slight side to side motion that feels like carsick. The MGM, um, doesn't. The MGM is also more composed on bad roads (though the Buick isn't bad). Win to the MGM.
Steering and handling. Compared to the MGM, the Buick feels much more nimble. The MGM while planted and confidence inspiring feels numb in comparison and even with the Watts link that live rear end does like to shift at that certain point in a high speed turn (know what I mean? ). While I didn't go rally racing in my dad's car (which he would appreciate), I suspect: Win to the Buick.
Styling: The Buick is more highly styled, while apart from the massive taillights and reflectors on the back the MGM isn't really, it's much more understated. I think the rear of the Buick is hideous while the larger grill is more similar to the MGMs big toothy grin. Also it's got a beautiful premium dark red paint and chrome rims that look really nice. I'm tempted to give the win to the Buick but it's so perhaps color driven or such a personal decision that even though I prefer the understated MGM: I'm calling it a wash.
Interior? Super tough call. They're such different cars even if they are (were) sold into the same market (old people wearing fedoras). With the 3 seats in the front the MGM can't have a center console. The plus, it feels even bigger than it is. The minus, a little perhaps old fashioned feel. The Buicks' interior feels more modern. The quality of plastics are similar. The controls in the MGM are far, far easier to use and much more intuitive with the exception of the steering controls, the Buicks have a better layout. The dash, I've been looking at the digital dash in the MGM for a long, long time (my 97 was the same unit), so I feel a little uncomfortable comparing them. I do prefer a dial speedo to the numbers in the MGM overall though. So I'm calling it a wash.
Conclusion: The Buick is not a bad car. Actually, if it wasn't for the size/v6/fwd/unibody it might not be a bad vehicle for us. But it is those things, so it really isn't. Per the above 2 wins for the Buick, 3 wins for the MGM, and 3 washes. The MGM by 1 on the scoreboard, and by a million on the soul.
Pete
Partial fail. AC fan runs constantly and - the bloody check engine light is still on
I'll be calling shortly. But the engine does run smoother and they did end up replacing the lower steering shaft. Tranny flush and new filter. And the AC does work.
So it might be going back for the engine light (it's not on the receipt). If not I start moving forward with the interior/stereo, then come the week of the 12th I'm off and will be making the big push on the suspension.
It's hard not to make a head to head comparison between the 03 and the 08 Lacrosse I've been driving. So I will
The Lacrosse does feel more 'modern' somehow. It's quieter overall, and quicker off the line, and freeway downshifts, where you use it most. Not a bad car. Acceleration = win to the Buick (even if the MGM will probably pass it down the road).
The MGM feels much more planted and much more comfortable, to me. It also feels like a more quality car than the Buick. My dad paid $22k for his, my sticker says $30k, I figure it probably actually sold for around $25k or so? Around $3-5k difference and 5 years of inflation, maybe the MGM SHOULD feel better put together. So call it a wash.
Space/truck - Win to MGM, obviously, though the Buick has a 'decent' trunk.
Gas mileage, no significant difference overall! I get around 20 average, his readout says around 21. Over 10k miles at $3.50 per gallon that amounts to a savings of less than a hundred bucks. Win to the much, much larger MGM.
Ride, the Buick has an odd slight side to side motion that feels like carsick. The MGM, um, doesn't. The MGM is also more composed on bad roads (though the Buick isn't bad). Win to the MGM.
Steering and handling. Compared to the MGM, the Buick feels much more nimble. The MGM while planted and confidence inspiring feels numb in comparison and even with the Watts link that live rear end does like to shift at that certain point in a high speed turn (know what I mean? ). While I didn't go rally racing in my dad's car (which he would appreciate), I suspect: Win to the Buick.
Styling: The Buick is more highly styled, while apart from the massive taillights and reflectors on the back the MGM isn't really, it's much more understated. I think the rear of the Buick is hideous while the larger grill is more similar to the MGMs big toothy grin. Also it's got a beautiful premium dark red paint and chrome rims that look really nice. I'm tempted to give the win to the Buick but it's so perhaps color driven or such a personal decision that even though I prefer the understated MGM: I'm calling it a wash.
Interior? Super tough call. They're such different cars even if they are (were) sold into the same market (old people wearing fedoras). With the 3 seats in the front the MGM can't have a center console. The plus, it feels even bigger than it is. The minus, a little perhaps old fashioned feel. The Buicks' interior feels more modern. The quality of plastics are similar. The controls in the MGM are far, far easier to use and much more intuitive with the exception of the steering controls, the Buicks have a better layout. The dash, I've been looking at the digital dash in the MGM for a long, long time (my 97 was the same unit), so I feel a little uncomfortable comparing them. I do prefer a dial speedo to the numbers in the MGM overall though. So I'm calling it a wash.
Conclusion: The Buick is not a bad car. Actually, if it wasn't for the size/v6/fwd/unibody it might not be a bad vehicle for us. But it is those things, so it really isn't. Per the above 2 wins for the Buick, 3 wins for the MGM, and 3 washes. The MGM by 1 on the scoreboard, and by a million on the soul.
Pete
Comment