Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

>15" wheels + lower aspect ratio tires?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    >15" wheels + lower aspect ratio tires?

    This November, partly because they were cool, partly because winter was coming, and in large part because they were new and cheap off craigslist (guy bought them for a jeep he totalled before getting installed, new with stickers still on 'em) and much less money than any hankooks at sears
    I've got 4 225/75/R15 pirelli scorpion atr tires on my stock 15 wheels, for a 1990 grand marq wagon. Stock size was 215/70/R15; these tires are a little bigger but fit just fine.

    However...
    last summer I was getting 18mpg for sure, often 20, and once even 24mpg (allll highway on that trip).
    This winter? 16mpg consistently.
    Yuck.

    I'm wondering if it was just winter gas, if that could really shave 3+mpg off average fuel economy?
    But I'm worried that these light truck/suv/"all terrain" tires might have killed my fuel economy from the higher rolling resistance.

    The high aspect ratio and softer quasi-mudslinging design, at least compared to a dedicated highway tire, certainly can't help.

    So I'm wondering if I might want these for winter tires then, and consider --when I have some money in 4months, I'm wiped out for now-- larger wheels, like 16 or 17", and shorter aspect ratio tires for the highway?

    The lug pattern must be the same,
    and the final diameter should be the same too...
    I was just playing with some numbers. If it exists, and is a common size, a 215/55/R17 tire will be the same total diameter as 215/70/R15 just for example.

    What are some common sizes of wheel with the same lug pattern, or popular donor car?

    Finally, can't be too pretentious. I *hate* 20" chrome wheels + a lift kit on a grand marquis, and if I go for a larger tire I can't begin to approach that aesthetic. Something toned down.



    thanks for the advice!

    #2
    OK: I've answered some of my own questions. It's a 5x4.5 lug pattern.
    Most of the jeeps and explorers have 5x4.5 lugs but seem to also be 15" wheels.
    Unfortunately, mustangs DO have the right bolt pattern, but they all seem to be very wide tires, like 245-285?
    Hmm... seems a lexus actually has a 5x4.5 lug pattern, and have narrower and less flashy wheels than the mustangs....

    Any other thoughts for compatible wheels?

    And, is the entire premise --that replacing a high aspect ratio truck tire with a low aspect ratio street tire + wider wheel, will improve fuel economy while admittedly looking somewhat cool-- correct, or in fact unfounded?
    and my fuel economy issues are either winter gas, subtly changed driving styles, or some other undiagnosed issue!
    Last edited by BerniniCaCO3; 04-02-2011, 02:13 AM.

    Comment


      #3
      it's the tires....those are prob good in snow tho and not cheap.........get some 16" wheels and a set of 225/60/16 tires........keep the 15" tires on the wheels for winter driving

      1986 lincoln towncar signature series. 5.0 HO with thumper performance ported e7 heads, 1.7 roller rockers, warm air intake, 65mm throttle body, 1/2" intake spacer, ported intakes, 3.73 rear with trac lock, 98-02 front brake conversion, 92-97 rear disc conversion, 1" rear swaybar, 1 3/16" front swaybar, 16" wheels and tires, loud ass stereo system, badass cb, best time to date 15.94 at 87 mph. lots of mods in the works 221.8 rwhp 278 rwt
      2006 Lincoln Town Car Signature. Stock for now
      1989 Ford F-250 4x4 much much more to come, sefi converted so far.
      1986 Toyota pickup with LSC wheels and 225/60/16 tires.
      2008 Hyundai Elantra future Revcon toad
      1987 TriBurner and 1986 Alaska stokers keeping me warm. (and some pesky oil heat)

      please be patient, rebuilding an empire!

      Comment


        #4
        What's this about fuel economy and 20" wheels? I get lousy fuel economy in the winter mostly because it takes 4-5 gallons of gas just to get the car started. And traction and safety always take precedence over rolling resistance.


        I have one set of 235/60/16, and they're almost exactly stock height (27"). I really like my two sets of '98-'02 wheels. I also like avoiding those endless irritable e-mails back and forth with sellers trying to explain that you really do need more info than just the bead seat diameter!
        2012 Mazda5 Touring | Finally working on the LTD again!

        Comment


          #5
          Also consider the speedometer is not accurate with different size tires. Taller tires log less mileage which shows as lower fuel economy.
          86 Lincoln Town Car (Galactica).
          5.0 HO, CompCams XE258,Scorpion 1.72 roller rockers, 3.55 K code rear, tow package, BHPerformance ported E7 heads, Tmoss Explorer intake, 65mm throttle body, Hedman 1 5/8" headers, 2.5" dual exhaust, ASP underdrive pulley

          91 Lincoln Mark VII LSC grandpa spec white and cranberry

          1984 Lincoln Continental TurboDiesel - rolls coal

          Originally posted by phayzer5
          I drive a Lincoln. I can't be bothered to shift like the peasants and rabble rousers

          Comment


            #6
            Uh, did you do the correction factor for the oversized tires? The tires are taller so the odometer will read LOW. The travelled distance will be farther than the odometer thinks it is. which will f up your MPG calculations.

            also, winter gas and cold weather in general kill fuel economy. I normally lose 3-4 mpg in the winter- with all of my cars

            As for 17" wheels tires....mustang wheels have been discussed a lot.. The stock 17" crown vic tire (late model panthers) are 235/55/17- which are also used onthe newer mustangs. They are widely available, inexpensive and 27 overall diameter.
            Builder/Owner of Badass Panther Wagons

            Busy maintaining a fleet of Fords

            Comment


              #7
              But, will the later CV 17" wheels fit on the older cars?
              89 CV LX 225/60 x 16 tires, CC819 rear springs, Front & rear sway bar, trans & PS cooler from 90 cop car. KYB shocks, F-150 on rear. Dual Exhaust w/ H pipe. Dark brown door panels, carpet, steering wheel, trim parts from a 87 Mer GM. Power front buckets from 96 Jeep Cherokee. LED'S front & rear. 3G Alt from a 97 Taurus wagon 3.0. Electric fan. Rear axle from a 97 PI 3.27 with disk brakes. Headlight relays.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Glen View Post
                But, will the later CV 17" wheels fit on the older cars?

                READ THE FAQ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
                Builder/Owner of Badass Panther Wagons

                Busy maintaining a fleet of Fords

                Comment


                  #9
                  Are we back to that silly answer again?
                  89 CV LX 225/60 x 16 tires, CC819 rear springs, Front & rear sway bar, trans & PS cooler from 90 cop car. KYB shocks, F-150 on rear. Dual Exhaust w/ H pipe. Dark brown door panels, carpet, steering wheel, trim parts from a 87 Mer GM. Power front buckets from 96 Jeep Cherokee. LED'S front & rear. 3G Alt from a 97 Taurus wagon 3.0. Electric fan. Rear axle from a 97 PI 3.27 with disk brakes. Headlight relays.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    since the answer to your question is already there in the FAQ... I would guess so.

                    but the LMGTFY answer is yes... all later wheels will fit older cars (within panther models that is). The lug spacing is the same. The reverse is not true since the later models have larger brakes (don't remember which years off the top of my head) and need at least 16" wheels. So the 15" turbines on my 82 Mark VI will not fir a current CV, but will fir fine on my 93 CV or 88 MGM.

                    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. -- Albert Einstein
                    rides: 93 Crown Vic LX (The Red Velvet Cake), 2000 Crown Vic base model (Sandy), 2003 Expedition (the vacation beast)

                    Originally posted by gadget73
                    ... and it should all work like magic and unicorns and stuff.

                    Originally posted by dmccaig
                    Overhead, some poor bastards are flying in airplanes.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by slymer View Post
                      since the answer to your question is already there in the FAQ... I would guess so.

                      but the LMGTFY answer is yes... all later wheels will fit older cars (within panther models that is). The lug spacing is the same. The reverse is not true since the later models have larger brakes (don't remember which years off the top of my head) and need at least 16" wheels. So the 15" turbines on my 82 Mark VI will not fir a current CV, but will fir fine on my 93 CV or 88 MGM.
                      IIRC 98+ can't use smaller than 16" wheels.
                      sigpic


                      - 1990 Ford LTD Crown Victoria P72 - the street boat - 5.0 liter EFI - Ported HO intake/TB, 90 TC shroud/overflow, Aero airbox/zip tube, Cobra camshaft, 19lb injectors, dual exhaust w/ Magnaflows, Cat/Smog & AC delete, 3G alternator, MOOG chassis parts & KYB cop shocks, 215/70r/15s on 95-97 Merc rims

                      - 2007 Ford Escape XLT - soccer mom lifted station wagon - 3.0 Duratec, auto, rear converter delete w/ Magnaflow dual exhaust

                      - 2008 Mercury Grand Marquis Ultimate Edition - Daily driver - 4.6 2 valve Mod motor, 4R75E, 2.73s. Bone stock

                      Comment


                        #12
                        And, do you have to use spacers to get the right offset?
                        89 CV LX 225/60 x 16 tires, CC819 rear springs, Front & rear sway bar, trans & PS cooler from 90 cop car. KYB shocks, F-150 on rear. Dual Exhaust w/ H pipe. Dark brown door panels, carpet, steering wheel, trim parts from a 87 Mer GM. Power front buckets from 96 Jeep Cherokee. LED'S front & rear. 3G Alt from a 97 Taurus wagon 3.0. Electric fan. Rear axle from a 97 PI 3.27 with disk brakes. Headlight relays.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          '03+ Panthers went to a high-offset wheel (more backspacing) with the suspension redesign. What wheel are you using on what?
                          2012 Mazda5 Touring | Finally working on the LTD again!

                          Comment


                            #14
                            I just want to go to a 16" wheel. 15" tires in the size I want are getting rare.
                            89 CV LX 225/60 x 16 tires, CC819 rear springs, Front & rear sway bar, trans & PS cooler from 90 cop car. KYB shocks, F-150 on rear. Dual Exhaust w/ H pipe. Dark brown door panels, carpet, steering wheel, trim parts from a 87 Mer GM. Power front buckets from 96 Jeep Cherokee. LED'S front & rear. 3G Alt from a 97 Taurus wagon 3.0. Electric fan. Rear axle from a 97 PI 3.27 with disk brakes. Headlight relays.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              If you're currently in a 15", it must be a pre-'98.

                              In that case, a stock 16x7 from '98-'02 works good. No spacers. See my sig pic, I've got two sets. Again, 235/60/16 is 27" tall, and 225/60/16 is a bit shorter and has a pretty big selection.
                              2012 Mazda5 Touring | Finally working on the LTD again!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X