Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Help me map out my 351W!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Merc- would the GT-40s be safe with high-comp pistons? Would I still be looking to have them reworked with new valves or are they okay as-is?

    I'm still learning about what makes better horsepower and what makes better torque. Again, thanks!
    2011 Mustang GT Premium, MT82, Kona/Saddle, HIDs, 3.73s, 19s, hood/side stripes, UPR 1.5" springs with adjustable panhard bar, and UMI solid LCAs and relocation brackets.
    1992 Explorer Eddie Bauer, slight lift, 34s, and A/C...
    1979 Bronco Custom, 351M/C6/NP205, 4" lift, 35s, lots of fender trimming.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by Freshmeat
      Merc- would the GT-40s be safe with high-comp pistons? Would I still be looking to have them reworked with new valves or are they okay as-is?

      I'm still learning about what makes better horsepower and what makes better torque. Again, thanks!
      Why would you be worried about high compression? Flat tops is all you need for your application. Stock valves with good springs is all you need.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Freshmeat
        I'm still learning about what makes better horsepower and what makes better torque.
        It takes torque to make horsepower. You want the maximum torque within your desired RPM operating range. This is true for any engine.

        Comment


          #34
          Flat tops is what I'm planning for the 10:1- guy at the shop said they'll give me 9.9-10.1:1 CR, so that's what I'm doing... but would the valves clear that? I know the torque cam won't have as tall a profile...
          2011 Mustang GT Premium, MT82, Kona/Saddle, HIDs, 3.73s, 19s, hood/side stripes, UPR 1.5" springs with adjustable panhard bar, and UMI solid LCAs and relocation brackets.
          1992 Explorer Eddie Bauer, slight lift, 34s, and A/C...
          1979 Bronco Custom, 351M/C6/NP205, 4" lift, 35s, lots of fender trimming.

          Comment


            #35
            most aftermarket pistons will have valves reliefs designed for high lift cams, so you should be fine with what your building

            RIP Jason P Harril, we'll miss ya bro

            '80 Town Coupé
            '84 Towncar - Teh Cobra TC, 408w powered
            '16 Ram 1500 CC Outdoorsman, Hemi/3.92/8sp 4x4

            Comment


              #36
              used GT40's can be found cheap on corral usually. Most of them are 400 and under.


              And I have a set of 66 289 2V heads sitting in my basement. Need alot of work though.
              Builder/Owner of Badass Panther Wagons

              Busy maintaining a fleet of Fords

              Comment


                #37
                Okay. So, I'll plan for GT-40s. Do I port them? Do I increase the valve size?
                2011 Mustang GT Premium, MT82, Kona/Saddle, HIDs, 3.73s, 19s, hood/side stripes, UPR 1.5" springs with adjustable panhard bar, and UMI solid LCAs and relocation brackets.
                1992 Explorer Eddie Bauer, slight lift, 34s, and A/C...
                1979 Bronco Custom, 351M/C6/NP205, 4" lift, 35s, lots of fender trimming.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by Freshmeat
                  Okay. So, I'll plan for GT-40s. Do I port them? Do I increase the valve size?
                  You are going to be running low RPM's. Unless you are willing to pay a competent shop $1500+ to massage and flow your heads, leave the ports and valve size alone.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    The local machine shop wants $500 for port/polish and larger valves. This is all they do- head and engine assemblies.
                    Are you saying to skip that? I guess I should wait until I select a cam before I get too far into what I'm doing with the heads. It's likely the torque cam would reach its limit before those GT-40s became a restriction, now that I think about it.
                    2011 Mustang GT Premium, MT82, Kona/Saddle, HIDs, 3.73s, 19s, hood/side stripes, UPR 1.5" springs with adjustable panhard bar, and UMI solid LCAs and relocation brackets.
                    1992 Explorer Eddie Bauer, slight lift, 34s, and A/C...
                    1979 Bronco Custom, 351M/C6/NP205, 4" lift, 35s, lots of fender trimming.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by Mercracer
                      Originally posted by DuceAnAHalf
                      We have a set of E8JE heads that came with those valves stock. we believe the exhaust valve is swirl polished stainless.
                      Do those heads have 2 vertical bars cast on the ends? I thought it started in 89, but those E8JE Marine heads may be the first version of the Modern GT-40 heads used by Ford.
                      I looked today and there are two bold vertical stripes on the end of the head. :slug:
                      http://secondhandracing.com/Home.aspx
                      http://secondhandradio.com/

                      R.I.P. Jason P Harrill 6-12-06

                      http://www.grandmarq.net/vb/showthread.php?t=5634

                      Comment


                        #41
                        What do you think about manifolds? I'm all about Edelbrock, but I don't see one designed for low end on the site...
                        2011 Mustang GT Premium, MT82, Kona/Saddle, HIDs, 3.73s, 19s, hood/side stripes, UPR 1.5" springs with adjustable panhard bar, and UMI solid LCAs and relocation brackets.
                        1992 Explorer Eddie Bauer, slight lift, 34s, and A/C...
                        1979 Bronco Custom, 351M/C6/NP205, 4" lift, 35s, lots of fender trimming.

                        Comment


                          #42
                          Originally posted by Freshmeat
                          What do you think about manifolds? I'm all about Edelbrock, but I don't see one designed for low end on the site...
                          the Performer manifold is idle-5,500RPM stay away from single-plane manifolds, such as the torkers, victors and the others. Single plane intakes dont build power till around 2,500rpm
                          http://secondhandracing.com/Home.aspx
                          http://secondhandradio.com/

                          R.I.P. Jason P Harrill 6-12-06

                          http://www.grandmarq.net/vb/showthread.php?t=5634

                          Comment


                            #43
                            Originally posted by Freshmeat
                            What do you think about manifolds? I'm all about Edelbrock, but I don't see one designed for low end on the site...
                            Performer RPM. Stay away from the Performer unless you are putting it in a truck for towing. The Performer RPM will give you room to grow.

                            Comment


                              #44
                              Originally posted by Mercracer
                              Performer RPM. Stay away from the Performer unless you are putting it in a truck for towing. The Performer RPM will give you room to grow.
                              It's going to be in an old CJ7 with 38" tires (35s to start) and 1-ton axles. Still recommend the RPM? Aiming the power band to be really low, since most of it will be crawling, anyway.
                              2011 Mustang GT Premium, MT82, Kona/Saddle, HIDs, 3.73s, 19s, hood/side stripes, UPR 1.5" springs with adjustable panhard bar, and UMI solid LCAs and relocation brackets.
                              1992 Explorer Eddie Bauer, slight lift, 34s, and A/C...
                              1979 Bronco Custom, 351M/C6/NP205, 4" lift, 35s, lots of fender trimming.

                              Comment


                                #45
                                Originally posted by Freshmeat
                                It's going to be in an old CJ7 with 38" tires (35s to start) and 1-ton axles. Still recommend the RPM? Aiming the power band to be really low, since most of it will be crawling, anyway.
                                For crawling, the Performer would probably be fine.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X