What could be why my fuel consumption is so high? I filled the tires to the proper PSI and will probably be doing new plugs and wires very soon. All the driving is city driving with no hard accelerations at all.
![]() |
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
gone 90kms and burnt 3/8s of a tank of gas?
Collapse
X
-
gone 90kms and burnt 3/8s of a tank of gas?
2011 Ford Ranger Sport 4.0 2wd - Magnaflow Axleback exhaust, K&N 63 Series CAI, DiabloSport 87 Octane tune, LEDs, 3000K LED projector fogs, 5000K Mini H1 projectors - Daily
1967 Ford Galaxie 500 Sedan "C-Code" - 289 2bbl/Cruise-O-Matic - Money pit/projectTags: None
-
It could be quite a bit of things. However I don't entirely think the fuel gauges are that accurate. Mine shoots down to half a tank pretty fast and then goes a lot slower to E. And when it's at E, it still has about three gallons left.
You definitely have the right idea with plugs and wires. While you're at it, I would also check the timing. Vacuum leaks can also cause bad mileage (depending on the leak)
1989 Lincoln Town Car Signature Series | 249k miles, current project car
2018 BMW 430i xDrive M-Sport | 50k miles
2018 Toyota Tacoma TRD Sport | 97k miles
-
I've read a lot about lazy oxygen sensors causing increased fuel consumption, but I'm no expert.
2000 Grand Marquis LS HPP, a hand-me-down in 2008 with 128,000 km; 175,000 km as of July 2014
mods: air filter box 'tuba', headlight relay harness, J-mod (around 186,350 km), 70mm throttle body, KYB Gas-A-Just shocks, aluminum driveshaft, ARA3 PCM
Comment
-
city MPG will probably be around 13-15mpg (whatever that is in km/g) when running right. I've also had the pump at the filling station click off too soon on me and didn't actually fill the tank up and end up looking like a used more gas than I actually did.
That said, check for smell of gas under the hood or wet looking places anywhere along the driver side frame rail from the gas tank all the way to the engine. Leaky fuel lines will make for terrible mileage too.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. -- Albert Einstein
rides: 93 Crown Vic LX (The Red Velvet Cake), 2000 Crown Vic base model (Sandy), 2003 Expedition (the vacation beast)
Originally posted by gadget73
... and it should all work like magic and unicorns and stuff.
Originally posted by dmccaig
Overhead, some poor bastards are flying in airplanes.
Comment
-
Originally posted by L1011tristar17 View PostIt could be quite a bit of things. However I don't entirely think the fuel gauges are that accurate. Mine shoots down to half a tank pretty fast and then goes a lot slower to E. And when it's at E, it still has about three gallons left.
You definitely have the right idea with plugs and wires. While you're at it, I would also check the timing. Vacuum leaks can also cause bad mileage (depending on the leak)
2011 Ford Ranger Sport 4.0 2wd - Magnaflow Axleback exhaust, K&N 63 Series CAI, DiabloSport 87 Octane tune, LEDs, 3000K LED projector fogs, 5000K Mini H1 projectors - Daily
1967 Ford Galaxie 500 Sedan "C-Code" - 289 2bbl/Cruise-O-Matic - Money pit/project
Comment
-
Well, its an American car. They get terrible fuel economy on metric gasoline.86 Lincoln Town Car (Galactica).
5.0 HO, CompCams XE258,Scorpion 1.72 roller rockers, 3.55 K code rear, tow package, BHPerformance ported E7 heads, Tmoss Explorer intake, 65mm throttle body, Hedman 1 5/8" headers, 2.5" dual exhaust, ASP underdrive pulley
91 Lincoln Mark VII LSC grandpa spec white and cranberry
1984 Lincoln Continental TurboDiesel - rolls coal
Originally posted by phayzer5
I drive a Lincoln. I can't be bothered to shift like the peasants and rabble rousers
Everything looks like voodoo if you don't understand how it works
Comment
-
Originally posted by gadget73 View PostWell, its an American car. They get terrible fuel economy on metric gasoline.
For those who might actually be interested in knowing the difference between the American and metric methods for calculating gas consumption (eg. Americans who love Canadian cottage country), the American method uses how far you go with a given amount of gas (miles per gallon) while the metric method uses how much gas you need to go a certain distance (liters per 100km). There are lots of conversion calculators on the internet, so I won't bother with further details.
Something that bothers me about my so-called American car with a 4.6 LITER engine is that it has both metric and standard fasteners.
2000 Grand Marquis LS HPP, a hand-me-down in 2008 with 128,000 km; 175,000 km as of July 2014
mods: air filter box 'tuba', headlight relay harness, J-mod (around 186,350 km), 70mm throttle body, KYB Gas-A-Just shocks, aluminum driveshaft, ARA3 PCM
Comment
-
Well, you have a Canadian car. Yours was built in St Thomas. Lincolns were all built in Wixom, Michigan. Its also got a 302 cubic inch engine, so again, metric gasoline doesn't work.
it's a joke, relax. The pertinent suggestions were already made.86 Lincoln Town Car (Galactica).
5.0 HO, CompCams XE258,Scorpion 1.72 roller rockers, 3.55 K code rear, tow package, BHPerformance ported E7 heads, Tmoss Explorer intake, 65mm throttle body, Hedman 1 5/8" headers, 2.5" dual exhaust, ASP underdrive pulley
91 Lincoln Mark VII LSC grandpa spec white and cranberry
1984 Lincoln Continental TurboDiesel - rolls coal
Originally posted by phayzer5
I drive a Lincoln. I can't be bothered to shift like the peasants and rabble rousers
Everything looks like voodoo if you don't understand how it works
Comment
-
Originally posted by gadget73 View Post... it's a joke, relax. The pertinent suggestions were already made.
2000 Grand Marquis LS HPP, a hand-me-down in 2008 with 128,000 km; 175,000 km as of July 2014
mods: air filter box 'tuba', headlight relay harness, J-mod (around 186,350 km), 70mm throttle body, KYB Gas-A-Just shocks, aluminum driveshaft, ARA3 PCM
Comment
-
I never trust the gauge itself, I always divide the gallons of gas used by the miles driven since the last fill up if I want the most accurate reading.
Btw whenever people joke around (or appear to joke around) on the internet I always think of Poe's law http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law As great as technology can be that's the Achilles heel of internet communication in my opinion. Sorry to jack your thread there for a second
sigpic
Comment
-
How much idling did you do? How many cold starts? You could have just had an unusually bad set of circumstances for mileage. My daily commute can be anywhere from 10 to 15 l/100km.
85 4 door 351 Civi Crown Victoria - Summer daily driver, sleeper in the making, and wildly inappropriate autocross machine
160KMs 600cfm holley, shorty headers, 2.5" catted exhaust, 255/295 tires, cop shocks, cop swaybars, underdrive pulley, 2.73L gears.
waiting for install: 3.27's, Poly bushings, boxed rear arms, 2500 stall converter, ported e7's, etc
06 Mazda 3 hatch 2.3L 5AT (winter beater that cost more than my summer car)
Comment
-
Originally posted by 84GrandMarquis View PostI never trust the gauge itself, I always divide the gallons of gas used by the miles driven since the last fill up if I want the most accurate reading.
Btw whenever people joke around (or appear to joke around) on the internet I always think of Poe's law http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law As great as technology can be that's the Achilles heel of internet communication in my opinion. Sorry to jack your thread there for a second86 Lincoln Town Car (Galactica).
5.0 HO, CompCams XE258,Scorpion 1.72 roller rockers, 3.55 K code rear, tow package, BHPerformance ported E7 heads, Tmoss Explorer intake, 65mm throttle body, Hedman 1 5/8" headers, 2.5" dual exhaust, ASP underdrive pulley
91 Lincoln Mark VII LSC grandpa spec white and cranberry
1984 Lincoln Continental TurboDiesel - rolls coal
Originally posted by phayzer5
I drive a Lincoln. I can't be bothered to shift like the peasants and rabble rousers
Everything looks like voodoo if you don't understand how it works
Comment
-
Originally posted by johnunit View PostHow much idling did you do? How many cold starts? You could have just had an unusually bad set of circumstances for mileage. My daily commute can be anywhere from 10 to 15 l/100km.
2011 Ford Ranger Sport 4.0 2wd - Magnaflow Axleback exhaust, K&N 63 Series CAI, DiabloSport 87 Octane tune, LEDs, 3000K LED projector fogs, 5000K Mini H1 projectors - Daily
1967 Ford Galaxie 500 Sedan "C-Code" - 289 2bbl/Cruise-O-Matic - Money pit/project
Comment
-
My 88 Town Car (about 245,000 kms, original engine) with a fresh tune up (plugs, wires, distributor cap+rotor button) cleaned K&N air filter, Lincoln Logs (1990 Town Car tubular exhaust manifolds), stock 2" dual exhaust with H-pipe, Flowmaster 50 Series mufflers and empty cats, new O2 sensors, fairly new MAP sensor, A/C inoperative (no passenger side drive belt) averages about 11.5-12 litres per 100 km highway (little to no stopping, speeds of 90 to 120 km/h), meaning I can get up to 500+km per tank. Excessive kick-down in passing traffic and speeds in excess of 120 km/h will cause economy to go south.
In town with lower speeds, stop-and-go driving, more idling, it goes down to 350-400 km per tank. I do find that short idling (< 5 minutes at a time) actually saves gas rather than shutting down and starting up every time I stop. Also, outdoor temperature affects fuel economy. 30 degrees Celsius will realize better economy than < 20 degrees.
Your best bet is to do a basic tune-up, adjust your driving to optimize fuel economy, and ensure good intake airflow/exhaust flow and eliminate any restrictions. Make sure you have no fuel leakage anywhere as well. Then you will get the best fuel economy possible.Summer car-> 1988 Lincoln Town Car, triple blue, 335,xxx km. New HO 5.0 in and running. Bought 2006/08/22. June 2017 PotM!
Winter vehicle-> 1995 Ford F-250 XLT SuperCab 4x4, 284,xxx+km. AKA "Brutus" 460/E4OD/4.10 axles and 12 MPG. Bought 2019/08/14
Originally posted by phayzer5I drive a Lincoln. I can't be bothered to shift like the peasants and rabble rousers
Comment
-
Originally posted by gadget73 View Postwell, as people get to know me, they should realize that the only thing I do in the extreme is mess with people. I'm not ambitious enough to have any truly extreme leanings about anything.
I just can’t help but think that there might be a naive American with an American-made car who is thinking “Gee, I guess I shouldn’t drive to Canada after all. They sell metric gas, and my mileage won’t be as good.” I’m not judging or anything, just sayin’ (though I will note that the phrase “Funny ... but wrong” from Cheaper by the Dozen does come to mind).
If things degrade to personal attacks and name-calling, that’s when I start thinking my time might be better spent elsewhere. I just don’t see the point of that sort of thing.
2000 Grand Marquis LS HPP, a hand-me-down in 2008 with 128,000 km; 175,000 km as of July 2014
mods: air filter box 'tuba', headlight relay harness, J-mod (around 186,350 km), 70mm throttle body, KYB Gas-A-Just shocks, aluminum driveshaft, ARA3 PCM
Comment
Comment