Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Throttle Body on a panther?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Where did you see that?!

    -ryan s.
    08 Lincoln Navigator L - 233k
    03 Mercury Marauder- 63k
    97 Ford Crown Victoria HPP "Tank of Justice III" (TOJ3) - 194k -->578.9 miles on ONE tank of gas<--
    94 BMW 325i Convertible - 135k
    73 VW Super Beetle "Bunky" <----- Wifey's
    12 Mini Cooper S - 90k <---- Wifey's
    Originally posted by pantera77
    Well my buddy tells him he knows exactly who loves buying shitboxes.

    Comment


      #32
      I heard it from this cam guy who got banned here.

      Myths topic #25: Higher HP = Lower ETs (need to be a member with 10 posts to view)
      2012 Mazda5 Touring | Finally working on the LTD again!

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by rick99601 View Post
        a mail order tune is fine for a pretty much stock vehicle. with any power adders and the like you need to get it on the dyno.

        ive used brenspeed for my SCT XC2, those tuners are dirt cheap now. take advantage of it.
        I tuned my truck with an SCT DCX, and it never hit the dyno. I had an internally stock Dodge 4.7, with a Paxton NOVI 2000 hung on it, pushing 13 psi, no intercooler. Headers and exhaust.

        Tuned it at home, through email. My tuner is a sharp guy. He'd send me a baseline safe tune, and I would datalog it with my laptop an Innovate LC-1 wideband OT-1 datalogger. I could hook them together and datalog any sensor in the truck as a function of rpm. Spark advance, MAP, AFR, ECT, etc, etc. I'd send him the logs, he'd adjust, and send me back a tune. My truck liked to stay in closed loop at WOT until PE timed out. In reality, if I went WOT and stayed in it, I would have blown the engine before PE timed out and it fattened up.

        It took 30 iterations of the tune to perfect because of a number of issues like this. But when we were done I was getting decent mileage, there were no drivability issues, and it pulled like crazy.

        You can tune a supercharged vehicle from your couch.

        Originally posted by rick99601 View Post
        either or

        what are the advantages of track tuning? i know thats the best way to do it, i dont know why though.
        I like the idea of track tuning because you are in an actual, and not simulated environment. On a dyno, the wind isn't moving over your car (sometimes they add a big fan for radiator air flow). But you aren't experiencing drag, or even the true cooling effects of the open air. Plus, you are just measuring worthless numbers.

        If you go to the track and tune, you know how certain changes affect the car, and not just the power numbers. Just because the dyno shows your car is making more power doesn't mean your car is going to be faster/ quicker. People use a dyno to optimize numbers, and a track to optimize performance.
        **2012 Ford Mustang Boss 302: 5.0/ 6 spd/ 3.73s, 20K Cruiser
        **2006 MGM,"Ultimate": 4.6/ 2.73/ Dark Tint, Magnaflows, 19s, 115K Daily Driver
        **2012 Harley Davidson Wide Glide (FXDWG):103/ Cobra Speedsters/ Cosmetics, 9K Poseur HD Rider
        **1976 Ford F-150 4WD: 360, 4 spd, 3.50s, factory A/C, 4" lift, Bilsteins, US Indy Mags, 35s Truck Duties

        Comment


          #34
          Went the junkyard this past weekend with SVT98 and Gabegt and we found an Econoline with a 5.4L engine(not sure which number what means after the E and I didn't look), and it had the larger throttlebody, but we didn't have the right tools to get it out at the time. But I would assume that any one of those Econolines with a 5.4(97 or newer), should have the right throttlebody.
          2002 Crown Victoria LX - 124K miles

          Comment

          Working...
          X